I should've mentioned this earlier, but I didn't really think it was important. I changed my mind.
My Spanish class on Thursday morning was about the recent political history of Latin America, and the professor decided to break down the various elements of 19th Century Latin-American society into "conservative" and "liberal" so we could see how the power structure worked.
Based on the way he made the chart, his understanding of politics is as follows:
- All rich people are conservative, because they keep their money instead of giving it to others.
-All people with power are conservative, because they want to hold onto their power instead of moving toward democracy.
-All poor people are liberal, because they want more money.
-All lower-class people are liberal, because they want more power.
-The church hovers around the center. It is conservative when it gains power, and liberal when it uses its influence for social activism.
-The military is totally conservative.
-Laborers and university students are all liberal.
DYOC (draw your own conclusions)
Did I mention this is a Spanish class? Shouldn't we be learning...SPANISH???
Posted by CD on March 26, 2004 12:49 AMwhat a fuckwad.
Posted by: annika at March 26, 2004 06:03 PMI have to agree. From this Conservative uni student's perspective, he is full of it.
Posted by: tommy at March 26, 2004 06:34 PMFrom the traditional sense of defining "liberal" and "conservative," things tend to get reversed (when big intrusive gov't were all, and slavery were the rage and the people that wanted to keep them, they were "conservatives," and the people that wanted liberty and a free market, and an end to slavery were "liberals." Those on the left (post-slavery of course) didn't like this so they started calling themselves liberals, hence how it works today. Anyway...
The chart sounds illogical, factually incorrect, too general, and he obviously is trying to use it as a political metaphor to today (which doesn't make any sense).
"Remember when the conservative Caesar became dictator over the liberal Roman Senate!"
Was Lenin a conservative then, he held power? (the college profs would LOVE that suggestion)
Anyway, it doesn't belong in a Spanish class.
Posted by: Jim at March 27, 2004 12:16 AMnike shox
shox shoes
nike shoes shox
nike shox running shoes
nike shoes
shox nz shoes
shox nz
shox torch
torch shoes
nike dream shoes
dream shoes
shox monster shoes
nike shox monster shoes
nike shox nz
nz shoes
shox oz
oz shoes
shox r3
nike shox r3
shox r4
nike shox r4
r4 torch
shox r4 torch
nike shox r5
shox r5
shox tl1
tl1 shox
tl3 nike shox
tl3 shox
nike shox turb
shox turb