You know, I've noticed that a lot of neolibs immediately call Bush a liar for saying that we went to Iraq in order to keep weapons out of the hands of dictators/terrorists and promote democracy. However, when someone like Osama bin Laden claims that he attacked us because of U.S. foreign policy, many of those same neolibs start whining about how we need to cease all involvement in the Middle East before we can be safe.
So, my question is this: Why do you constantly second-guess the president of the United States while taking a fanatical murderer at his word?
I'd really like an answer, but I don't think any moonbats actually read my blog. I have a guess, which I will include in a "Grand Theory of Leftism" that I've been formulating lately. Expect it to be posted sometime over Christmas.
UPDATE
And while you're at it, libs, would you please tell me why you oppose the War on Terror because it would create a "cycle of violence," but you support programs that try to end racism by discriminating on the basis of race?